Human data for software agents

Better software agents.
Built on human judgment.

We turn real feature requests, customer promises, launches, and roadmap tradeoffs into expert-built training data and evaluations.

Product judgment / evaluation design

A model can write the feature.

Does it know whether
it should?

01

Find missing context

Separate stated facts from assumptions.

02

Choose the right source

Inspect existing behavior before inventing it.

03

Preserve decision rights

Know which commitments need human approval.

04

Adapt to new evidence

Change the route when a key fact changes.

Four dimensions to evaluate in a focused product pilot.

01

Grounded in real work

Built from situations software teams have actually handled

02

Reviewed across functions

Product judgment checked across engineering, solutions, and product operations

03

Structured for research

Task inputs, action boundaries, variants, and scoring stay inspectable

What you receive

Everything needed to test the agent’s next move.

Every part stays separate and traceable, so your team can inspect the source, the expected behavior, and where a model failed.

Evaluation datasets

Realistic product tasks with expected behavior, scoring guides, what-if variants, and failure analysis.

Training examples

Expert-written examples that show how to find missing information and take a safe next step.

Preference data

Paired approaches and expert feedback that separate strong judgment from confident but unsafe behavior.

Interactive tasks

Controlled tasks for evaluating tool use and multi-step work after the core evaluation is proven.

Inside every task

Designed to expose shallow reasoning.

An answer alone is not enough. The agent must find what is missing, choose the right source, respect authority, and stop before an unsafe commitment.

01

Starting context

What the agent actually knows at the start

02

Unknowns

Facts that could change the decision

03

Sources

Systems, people, and approval owners

04

Boundaries

Safe actions, escalation points, and stops

05

Rubric

Strong behavior, weak reasoning, and critical failures

Quality & privacy

Private by design. Traceable by default.

Experts are asked to remove identifying details before submitting product-work examples. Standard exports exclude expert identity and raw narrative. Each task retains its source and review history.

Identifying details removed
Cross-functional review
Time-order checked
Source lineage retained
Purpose-bound exports
Export audit history

Private pilot

Start with the behavior you need to improve.

Tell us where your agent fails today. We’ll define a narrow workflow, review representative tasks, and agree on what useful results should prove.

  1. 01Share the target workflow
  2. 02Review sample tasks
  3. 03Agree on pilot scope
  4. 04Measure the result

We agree on scope, data permissions, and delivery terms before a pilot begins.

What are you exploring?